Statement of Support for St. Croix Health Center: The Board of the Town of Richmond strongly supports the retention of the St. Croix Health Center.   It has been suggested that closure of SCHC can be used to offset other projects, e.g. highway department building and jail expansion.  These and other projects should be able to stand on their own merit and if not, they should be resized or dropped rather than shifting monies from other funds. The aging of our population is well documented.  The SCHC provides high quality services for the aging along with other care.  Services and care that we all hope not to need but are reassured that should the need arise, quality care is available.   “There but for the grace of God, go I”  The Board for the Town of Richmond, urges the St. Croix County Board to dismiss consideration of the sale of the St. Croix Health Center. Gary Knutson; Chairman, Town of Richmond Dave Naser; Supervisor, Town of Richmond Jim Peirson; Supervisor, Town of Richmond Dave Stephens; Supervisor, Town of Richmond Jeff Van Dyk; Supervisor, Town of Richmond

Posted on , by Clerk

Notice of Partisan Primary and Referendum

Notice of Partisan Primary & Referendum

Tuesday, August 13, 2024

Polling Location

Town Hall – 1428 100th St. New Richmond

Voting Hours

7AM to 8PM

SAMPLE BALLOT

Type C Notice

NOTICE OF REFERENDUM ELECTION

August 13, 2024

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that at an election to be held in the Town of Richmond, on Tuesday, August 13, 2024, the following questions will be submitted to a vote of the people pursuant to law:

 

QUESTION 1: “Delegation of appropriation power. Shall section 35 (1) of article IV of the constitution be created to provide that the legislature may not delegate its sole power to determine how moneys shall be appropriated?”

QUESTION 2: “Allocation of federal moneys. Shall section 35 (2) of article IV of the constitution be created to prohibit the governor from allocating any federal moneys the governor accepts on behalf of the state without the approval of the legislature by joint resolution or as provided by legislative rule?”

EXPLANATORY STATEMENTS AS TO THE TWO QUESTIONS

Explanatory statement regarding Question 1:

The Wisconsin Constitution requires the legislature to appropriate funds from the state treasury only by passing a law, which requires a vote by both houses of the legislature. Wis. Const. art. VIII, § 2. Question 1 would add a new provision to say that the legislature cannot delegate this “sole” power to appropriate funds.

A “yes” vote on Question 1 would vote to create a new provision of the Wisconsin Constitution—Wis. Const. art. IV, § 35(1). That provision would prohibit the legislature from delegating its duty that it pass a law in order to appropriate money from the treasury under Wis. Const. art. VIII, § 2.

A “no” vote on Question 1 would vote not to add Wis. Const. art. IV, § 35(1) to the Wisconsin Constitution.

Explanatory statement regarding Question 2:

In times when Wisconsin receives undesignated federal funds from the U.S. government, the Wisconsin Constitution does not limit the ability of the governor to choose how the funds he accepts are divided among state and local agencies. Question 2 would add a new provision to the Constitution to prohibit the governor from choosing how to allocate such federal funds he accepts unless the legislature, through a joint resolution or some other process to be developed by the legislature, agrees with the governor’s proposed allocation of those funds.

A “yes” vote on Question 2 would vote to create a second new provision of the Wisconsin Constitution—Wis. Const. art. IV, § 35(2), which would prohibit the governor from choosing how to allocate undesignated federal monies he accepts unless the legislature, by joint resolution or other process, agrees with the governor’s proposed allocation of such funds.

A “no” vote on Question 2 would vote not to add Wis. Const. art. IV § 35(2) to the Wisconsin Constitution.